I suspect that the Abbey of the Trinity could be a completely generic monastery, and it would still see substantial use just for the tempo advantage of having a free monastery to compete with HRE/Delhi for relics. Tbh, when I play Rus I don't even buy the abbey of the trinity unique upgrades most of the time, I don't even know what most of them do.
#Age of empires gold patch upgrade#
(Being an imperial upgrade might even be weak, so you could maybe make it a castle age upgrade) Of course this would be weaker than the powerful regnitz landmark, so you would have to find a way to add more power to the civilization with !NewRegnitz and the Burgrave palace. It would probably be totally balanced if HRE had an imperial age upgrade that gave +100% gold income to all of their relics regardless of location (so it worked in keeps, or outposts or whatever). However, I agree with some of your other comments: Then imagine instead of being able to double produce 1 set of MAA per minute, you just have a landmark that produces 15 MAA per minute (well, 66s), for the price of 3. (And MAA building mangonels/springalds for the Mongols) For instance, consider that Mongol MAA push is pretty powerful, just from the mongols having a strong eco, and the ability to double-produce units from their military buildings meaning for a given number of production buildings you can get more units faster than your opponent. The buff/nerf suggestions are simply to get the mind going.įrom time to time, it does make me go ? when I see people suggest making the completely unused landmark for a civ ridiculously powerful so that it would be used more. My intention with these suggestions is to increase the rate at which people pick different landmarks. 3) Buff for military units is an AoE effect.Īlso buff Burgrave Palace to make the 5 military units for the cost of one (wild suggestion to bring up viability). 2) Auto-cast buff on nearby military units, also reduce cooldown of buff. Here's three wild ideas off the top of my head: 1) Increased HP and armor for Prelates. They are after all intended to be able to provide support mid-battle to the HRE.
New effect of Regnitz could be improvements to Prelate combat-viability. HRE is considered a "Religion" civilization, does it not make sense for something as central as the increased gold income from Relics inside Regnitz to simply be a part of the base mechanics of the HRE civilization? Maybe, make it so that the first three relics of the HRE provide increased gold income, and further relics after that give the usual +100 gold/min. This would hopefully make people choose between the two more often as opposed to choosing the Abbey 99% of the time.Īnother example Regnitz Cathedral. Reducing the cost of Warrior monk in general, and giving the unique Warrior monk upgrades to the regular Monestary (also, you should tag Rus as a "Religion" civilization instead of "Expansion"), and then overhauling Abbey of the Trinity for a new effect in-line with the High Trade House. The most obvious problem with this is running the risk of making that civilization overpowered, but that can always be compensated for with nerfs in other areas.įor example Abbey of the Trinity. If a certain landmark is considered a central part of the strategy of a civilization (examples Regnitz Cathedral and Abbey of the Trinity), and overshadows the other landmark for that tier by far perhaps consider making the effects of that landmark available to that civilization without the need for the landmark itself, while overhauling the landmark in question with a completely new effect? I know this'll be lost in a sea of other posts and notifications, but I'd just like to leave some suggestions regarding Landmarks, for you guys to keep in the back of your minds when considering landmark balancing at some point in the future: Competitive Age of Empires IV Discord (Displays all events).AoE4 World (Leaderboards, stats and tools).
0 kommentar(er)
